NewsLeecher Forums

I noticed the same thing on my system running at 1920x1080

First thing I noticed was missing was the filter bar in the explorer and supersearch tabs. I'll have to go back to NL 7 because I use those tabs way too much to go without them.

Got the error on b14 too. All newsleecher was doing at the time was leeching, not extracting or repairing anything.

Bug ID:
SPINLOCK_1231

Bug Data #1:
2

This isn't a big deal but the bug has been present for a long time.

I've run into the spinlock error too but it doesn't seem like it ever affected anything.

I tried a couple of posts and it seems to have been fixed.

This bug will never get fixed as only a million of us users are able to reproduce it but not the dev and they are more worried about adding banners to their software instead of concentrating on the real problems. It makes you wonder if the devs even use the program they created. It's not exactly a ...

Bug is still present in the latest beta.

I'm kind of amazed spiril hasn't been able to trigger this bug yet. You can trigger it pretty easily just using the program.

Bump.

Anything new on this? Like kublai said, it's a very annoying bug.

I just triggered the bug unfortunately. I removed the par set from r&e while it was in the middle of checking the release, which caused nl to spit out that error and change the download folder.

Experienced this again today but on a non-passworded post using b10 ufr6. No one else is getting nl reporting broken rars as complete?

Eric10301, Thanks for testing. Still no download folder reset if you keep R&E disabled ? Bug ID: renfi.0 Bug Data #2: System Error. Code: 32. The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process Is that error message triggered every time the download folder gets reset ? Wh...

Hi Eric, I just tested one and it didn't work. I'll send you a pm with the post. I tried the PAR2 set you PMed me, and the reason it isn't working is because it's doesn't follow the normal naming method for PAR2 split set files. I have implemented support for it anyway though, in the following unof...